City of Buffalo v. Marion

69 N.Y. St. Rep. 170
CourtSuperior Court of Buffalo
DecidedJuly 30, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 170 (City of Buffalo v. Marion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Buffalo v. Marion, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 170 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

White, J.

The charter of the city of Buffalo provides, among other things, that the common council shall from time to time enact ordinances to license and regulate auctioneers. Pursuant to that provision of the charter, the common council has enacted an ordinance prohibiting the sale of watches, at auction ' after six o’clock in the evening, under a penalty of $50. The defendant violated the ordinance; and this action is brought to recover penalty. The defendant claims that the ordinance is void, and the court below so decided. The ordinance in question follows the charter, and is authorized by it. The licensing of auctioneers, and the regulation of their conduct as such, has always been held, within this state, to be within the power of the legislature, and that statutes and ordinances for that purpose are valid. Rev. St.(Banks & Bros.’ 8th ed.) pt. 2, chap. 17, tit. 1; People ex rel. Schwab v. Grant, 126 N. Y. 473; 35 St. Rep. 596.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . Grant
27 N.E. 964 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.Y. St. Rep. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-buffalo-v-marion-nysuperctbuf-1895.