City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
This text of 99 N.Y.S. 1049 (City of Buffalo v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
dissents on the ground that even if the statute applies, the facts found in the eighteenth and nineteenth findings of fact show that there was not an abandonment of the street, within the meaning of the statute, and that so far as the facts contained in the third conclusion of law are at variance with the facts found in the eighteenth and nineteenth findings of fact, the latter must control. See Nickell v. Tracy, 184 N. Y. 386, 77 N. E. 391.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.Y.S. 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-buffalo-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nyappdiv-1906.