City of Bryan v. Knapp
This text of 488 N.E.2d 142 (City of Bryan v. Knapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Crim. R. 12(E) provides: “A motion made before trial other than a motion for change of venue, shall be timely determined before trial. Where factual issues are involved in determining a motion, the court shall state its essential findings on the record.” (Emphasis added.) In ruling on Knapp’s motion for discharge, the trial court on request by the [65]*65defendant was required to determine factual issues concerning the reasons for delay of the trial. Crim. R. 12(E) mandates that the court state its essential findings on the record.1 Without such findings, neither the court of appeals nor this court can properly review the propriety of the trial court’s ruling.
A trial court must, upon the defendant’s request, state essential findings of fact in support of its denial of a motion to discharge for failure to comply with the speedy trial provisions of R.C. 2945.71. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court for the purpose of stating its essential findings of fact on the record.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 N.E.2d 142, 21 Ohio St. 3d 64, 21 Ohio B. 363, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bryan-v-knapp-ohio-1986.