City of Brussels

5 F. Cas. 761, 6 Ben. 370
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BLATCHFORD. District Judge.

I think that the libel is one for breach of contract, and that the cause of action survived to the administrator, and may be sued for in rem, in like manner as if the deceased had sustained an injury short of death, through the negligence of those in charge of the vessel, and in breach of the contract of carriage, and had sued in rem therefor. Chamberlain v. Chandler [Case No. 2,575]; Crapo v. Allen [Id. 3,360]; The New World v. King, 16 How. [57 U. S.] 469; The Washington, 9 Wall. [76 U. S.] 513; The Aberfoyle [Case No. 17]; The Pacific [Id. 10,043]. The breach is alleged to have occurred during the running of the contract, and before the end of the voyage. The exceptions to the libel are •disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Brussels, 5 F. Cas. 761, 6 Ben. 370 (S.D.N.Y. 1873).

5 F. Cas. 761 (City of Brussels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Transocean Airlines
121 F. Supp. 85 (N.D. California, 1954)
The Harrisburg
119 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Van Pelt v. The Alaska
27 F. 704 (S.D. New York, 1886)