City of Bridgeton v. Loper

1 N.J. Misc. 401, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 14, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J. Misc. 401 (City of Bridgeton v. Loper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Bridgeton v. Loper, 1 N.J. Misc. 401, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in the per curiam opinion filed in the City of Bridgeton, defendant in certiorari, v. Hugh Smith, Jr., prosecutor in certiorari, the judgment in this case is reversed, with costs. See City of Bridgeton v. Smith, ante p. 398.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.J. Misc. 401, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bridgeton-v-loper-nj-1923.