City of Bridgeton v. Jones

127 A. 924, 101 N.J.L. 205, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 201
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 19, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 924 (City of Bridgeton v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Bridgeton v. Jones, 127 A. 924, 101 N.J.L. 205, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 201 (N.J. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — If one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 924, 101 N.J.L. 205, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bridgeton-v-jones-nj-1925.