City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage

387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597778, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2012

DocketNo. ED 97540

StatusPublished

This text of 387 S.W.3d 421 (City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage, 387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597778, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment finding defendant guilty of violating a municipal ordinance. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 80, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance •with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI