City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage

387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597778, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. ED 97540·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment finding defendant guilty of violating a municipal ordinance. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 80, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance •with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment finding defendant guilty of violating a municipal ordinance. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 80, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance •with Rule 84.16(b).

City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage, 387 S.W.3d 421, 2012 WL 6597778, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 421 (City of Bridgeton v. Flerlage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related