City of Bridgeport v. Bridgeport Coalition for Fair Representation
512 U.S. 1283, 115 S. Ct. 35
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 23, 1994·No. No. 94-218 (A-183)·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to vacate the judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and then to remand the cases to the District Court for further consideration in light of Johnson v. De Grandy, ante, p. 997. The Clerk is directed to issue the judgment forthwith. Application for stay, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Bridgeport v. Bridgeport Coalition for Fair Representation, 512 U.S. 1283, 115 S. Ct. 35 (1994).
512 U.S. 1283 (City of Bridgeport v. Bridgeport Coalition for Fair Representation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. Abbott
250 F. Supp. 3d 123 (W.D. Texas, 2017)
Pope v. County of Albany
687 F.3d 565 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Holliday Amusement Co. of Charleston, Inc. v. South Carolina
401 F.3d 534 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
Holliday Amusement Company Of Charleston, Incorporated v. State Of South Carolina
401 F.3d 534 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
Harold Frank and Forest County Potawatomi Community of Wisconsin v. Forest County
336 F.3d 570 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)