City of Brevard v. Ritter

201 S.E.2d 534, 20 N.C. App. 380, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2443
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided January 9, 1974·No. No. 7329SC387·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Subsequently affirmed by this Court, the order of Judge Falls, required, among other things, defendants to “remove that portion of construction . . . already completed” within 90 days. Defendants were permanently restrained “from constructing the pilot lounge and clubhouse and auxiliary hangar or extending or enlarging the airport facilities.” It appears to us that when Judge Falls uses the words “pilot lounge and clubhouse and auxiliary hangar” he was simply adopting the language of the parties to describe the offending structures which then and now constitute an extension of the nonconforming use. The stipulations are sufficient to show that defendants have failed to comply with the order, despite the fact that they may have changed the name of the offending structures.

The question of compliance or noncompliance with the explicit letter and intent of the order as entered was the essential question presented for resolution at the hearing. The order of 31 December 1972 is reversed and vacated and the cause is remanded for proceedings to assure compliance with the order of Judge Falls entered 23 February 1972.

Reversed and vacated.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Brevard v. Ritter, 201 S.E.2d 534, 20 N.C. App. 380, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2443 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

201 S.E.2d 534 (City of Brevard v. Ritter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Barr
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
City of Brevard v. Ritter
206 S.E.2d 151 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)