City of Bowling Green v. Lodico

216 N.E.2d 880, 6 Ohio St. 2d 167, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 261, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 364
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 18, 1966
DocketNo. 39990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 N.E.2d 880 (City of Bowling Green v. Lodico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Bowling Green v. Lodico, 216 N.E.2d 880, 6 Ohio St. 2d 167, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 261, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 364 (Ohio 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals was in error in overruling the motion to authenticate the hill of exceptions nunc pro tunc. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Ruthman, 85 Ohio St. 62.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmermaft, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and SCHNEIDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Bowling Green v. Lodico
228 N.E.2d 325 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.E.2d 880, 6 Ohio St. 2d 167, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 261, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bowling-green-v-lodico-ohio-1966.