City of Bowling Green v. Chasteen

852 N.E.2d 174, 110 Ohio St. 3d 179
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 2006
DocketNos. 2006-0780 and 2006-0841
StatusPublished

This text of 852 N.E.2d 174 (City of Bowling Green v. Chasteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Bowling Green v. Chasteen, 852 N.E.2d 174, 110 Ohio St. 3d 179 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Bowling Green v. Godwin, 110 Ohio St.3d 58, 2006-Ohio-3563, 850 N.E.2d 698, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent therewith.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Bowling Green v. Godwin
850 N.E.2d 698 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 N.E.2d 174, 110 Ohio St. 3d 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bowling-green-v-chasteen-ohio-2006.