City of Bloomfield Hills v. Froling
771 N.W.2d 739, 485 Mich. 866
Opinion
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William P. FROLING and Marilyn Froling, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2009 order *740 of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Bloomfield Hills v. Froling, 771 N.W.2d 739, 485 Mich. 866 (Mich. 2009).
771 N.W.2d 739 (City of Bloomfield Hills v. Froling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tisdale v. Sutton
771 N.W.2d 739 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)