City of Bismarck v. Wells
This text of 2018 ND 3 (City of Bismarck v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 3
City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Weston Kelvin Wells, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170173
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jason J. Hammes, Assistant City Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Chad R. McCabe, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.
City of Bismarck v. Wells
[¶1] Weston Wells appealed from a criminal judgment for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor entered upon a conditional guilty plea after the district court denied his motion to suppress. On appeal, Wells argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress chemical test results because he was denied his statutory right to the reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel before deciding whether to submit to chemical testing. We conclude the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). City of Dickinson v. Schank , 2017 ND 81, ¶ 12, 892 N.W.2d 593.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bismarck-v-wells-nd-2018.