City of Bismarck v. Pederson
This text of 2016 ND 191 (City of Bismarck v. Pederson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/4/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 191
City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Tiffany Pederson, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20160021
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jason J. Hammes, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58506-
5503, for plaintiff and appellee.
Dan L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.
City of Bismarck v. Pederson
[¶1] Tiffany Pederson appealed from a criminal judgment for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence entered upon a conditional guilty plea after the district court denied her motion to suppress. On appeal, Pederson argues the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress, contending the initial contact made by the officer constituted an illegal seizure. We conclude the district court’s decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bismarck-v-pederson-nd-2016.