City of Birmingham v. Odum, Bowers White

172 So. 124, 233 Ala. 374, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 31
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 14, 1937
Docket6 Div. 42.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 So. 124 (City of Birmingham v. Odum, Bowers White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Birmingham v. Odum, Bowers White, 172 So. 124, 233 Ala. 374, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 31 (Ala. 1937).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The principles of law applicable to this, appeal are stated in City of Birmingham et al. v. Hood-McPherson Realty Company (Hood-McPherson. Furniture Company, Intervener) (Ala. Sup.) 172 So. 114, 1 this day decided, arid necessitate an affirmance of the decree from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 352.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Louisville v. Louisville Automobile Club, Inc.
160 S.W.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 124, 233 Ala. 374, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-birmingham-v-odum-bowers-white-ala-1937.