City of Birmingham v. Hawkins

194 So. 538, 239 Ala. 9, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 76
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 11, 1940
Docket6 Div. 550.
StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 538 (City of Birmingham v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Birmingham v. Hawkins, 194 So. 538, 239 Ala. 9, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 76 (Ala. 1940).

Opinion

GARDNER, Justice.

Upon the question of substantive law, this cause is ruled by Eugene H. Hawkins v. City of Birmingham, post, p. 185, 194 So. 533, this day decided.

Upon the matter of remedy, the holding was that prohibition would lie.

As a consequence, the learned trial judge correctly ruled the present bill was without equity, and his decree will accordingly be here affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkins v. City of Birmingham
194 So. 533 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 538, 239 Ala. 9, 1940 Ala. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-birmingham-v-hawkins-ala-1940.