City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.

213 F. 450, 130 C.C.A. 96, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1904
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 1914·No. No. 2492·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the District Court (211 Fed. 497) restraining the appellants from enforcing “an ordinance to regulate the terms and rates of furnishing water to private consumers in the city of Birmingham.”

The record contains an elaborate opinion of the District Judge, in which he reviews the decisions of the United States and state courts upon the questions involved. We regard the conclusion announced by him as correct, and are therefore of opinion that the order should be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., 213 F. 450, 130 C.C.A. 96, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1904 (5th Cir. 1914).

213 F. 450 (City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Opelika v. Opelika Sewer Co.
265 U.S. 215 (Supreme Court, 1924)
In re Gerrow
233 F. 845 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1916)