City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk
This text of City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk (City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12-00122-CV
CITY OF BELLMEAD, Appellant v.
DEVIN KLUK, Appellee
From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-5034-4
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal,” stating that Appellee
has nonsuited his claims against Appellant and asking us to dismiss the appeal because
there is no longer a matter to prosecute or appeal and to tax costs against the party
incurring the cost. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion to dismiss is granted, and
the appeal is dismissed. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed
against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 23, 2012 [CV06]
City of Bellmead v. Kluk Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bellmead-v-devin-kluk-texapp-2012.