City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 2012·No. 10-12-00122-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00122-CV

CITY OF BELLMEAD, Appellant v.

DEVIN KLUK, Appellee

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-5034-4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal,” stating that Appellee

has nonsuited his claims against Appellant and asking us to dismiss the appeal because

there is no longer a matter to prosecute or appeal and to tax costs against the party

incurring the cost. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion to dismiss is granted, and

the appeal is dismissed. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed

against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 23, 2012 [CV06]

City of Bellmead v. Kluk Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk (City of Bellmead v. Devin Kluk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.