City of Beaufort v. Aman

185 S.E. 33, 180 S.C. 127, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 100
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 30, 1936·No. 14264·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

This is an appeal by City of Beaufort from order of Hon. J. Henry Johnson, Circuit Judge, reversing the recorder’s Court of the City of Beaufort, wherein respondent was found guilty of practicing law in the City of Beaufort without having procured a license as required by the ordinance of the city; and was sentenced to pay a fine of $25.00, or serve thirty days imprisonment, the sentence being suspended conditioned upon the respondent at once paying the license fee of $25.00.

It is the well-settled law of this State that a debtor when he makes a payment has the right to direct and control the application. See Bell v. Bell, 20 S. C., 34, and cases therein cited. Counsel for appellant admit in printed argument that appellant did not have a lien on respondent’s property.

After a careful study of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the Circuit Judge reached the proper conclusion, and the exceptions to his order, are overruled. Let the order be reported.

*130 Affirmed.

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham and FishburnE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Beaufort v. Aman, 185 S.E. 33, 180 S.C. 127, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 100 (S.C. 1936).

185 S.E. 33 (City of Beaufort v. Aman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bellamy v. Payne
403 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1991)
Schreiber v. Armstrong
374 P.2d 297 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1962)