City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.
253 A.2d 545, 54 N.J. 94, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 178
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 104 N. J. Super. 45.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc., 253 A.2d 545, 54 N.J. 94, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1969).
253 A.2d 545 (City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seegmiller v. County of Nevada
53 Cal. App. 4th 1397 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)
BETHANY BAPTIST CH. v. Deptford Tp.
542 A.2d 505 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Township of Jackson v. Marsyll of B. B. Inc.
3 N.J. Tax 386 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)
Atlantic County New School, Inc. v. City of Pleasantville
2 N.J. Tax 192 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)
MAYOR, BD. ALDERMEN OF DOVER v. Texlite, Inc.
273 A.2d 765 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)