City of Bayonne v. Doherty

138 A. 927, 101 N.J. Eq. 737, 16 Stock. 737, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 595
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A. 927 (City of Bayonne v. Doherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Bayonne v. Doherty, 138 A. 927, 101 N.J. Eq. 737, 16 Stock. 737, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 595 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

*738 Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A. 927, 101 N.J. Eq. 737, 16 Stock. 737, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-bayonne-v-doherty-nj-1927.