City of Baton Rouge v. Norman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of Baton Rouge v. Norman

282 So. 2d 514, 1973 La. LEXIS 6785

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Baton Rouge v. Norman. Read the opinion of the Court — 1974 La. LEXIS 3487 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 14, 1973·No. No. 53868·Published

Opinions

In re: James Norman applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted. (See Order)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 2nd day of November, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 10th day of December, 1973, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: James Norman applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted. (See Order)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 2nd day of November, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 10th day of December, 1973, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

City of Baton Rouge v. Norman, 282 So. 2d 514, 1973 La. LEXIS 6785 (La. 1973).

Pincite

282 So. 2d 514 (City of Baton Rouge v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.