City of Baton Rouge v. Dees

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of Baton Rouge v. Dees

359 So. 2d 632, 1978 La. LEXIS 6021

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 16, 1978

DocketNo. 62355

StatusPublished

This text of 359 So. 2d 632 (City of Baton Rouge v. Dees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, 359 So. 2d 632, 1978 La. LEXIS 6021 (La. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Keith Dees applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habe-as corpus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable William Brown, Judge of the City Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of June, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Keith Dees applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habe-as corpus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable William Brown, Judge of the City Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of June, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 So. 2d 632, 1978 La. LEXIS 6021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-baton-rouge-v-dees-la-1978.