City Of Auburn v. Qwest Corporation

247 F.3d 966, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3987, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3214, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City Of Auburn v. Qwest Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F.3d 1160
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2001·No. 99-36173·Published

Opinion

247 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2001)

CITY OF AUBURN; CITY OF BREMERTON; CITY OF DES MOINES; CITY OF FEDERAL WAY; A MUNICIPALITY; CITY OF LAKEWOOD; CITY OF MEDINA; CITY OF OLYMPIA; CITY OF PUYALLUP; CITY OF RENTON; CITY OF SEATAC; CITY OF TACOMA; CITY OF TUKWILA; CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE; CITY OF VANCOUVER, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
QWEST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 99-36173, 99-36219

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted February 6, 2001,
Filed April 24, 2001

NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 260 F.3d 1160.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City Of Auburn v. Qwest Corporation, 247 F.3d 966, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3987, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3214, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7399 (9th Cir. 2001).

247 F.3d 966 (City Of Auburn v. Qwest Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.
247 F.3d 966 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)