City of Atlanta v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

City of Atlanta v. Yellow Cab Co.

124 S.E. 50, 158 Ga. 633, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 316

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 22, 1924

DocketNo. 4330

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 50 (City of Atlanta v. Yellow Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Atlanta v. Yellow Cab Co., 124 S.E. 50, 158 Ga. 633, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 316 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. The amendment offered by the petitioner was properly allowed, and was not open to the criticism that it was not germane . to the cause of action stated in the original petition.

2. While there is some lack of'harmony in the authorities relating to the question involved in this application for injunction, these differences of opinion among the courts existed at the time of the decision in the ease of Cosgrove v. City of Augusta, 103 Ga. 835 (31 S. E. 445, 42 L. R. A. 711, 68 Am. St. R. 149); and it appearing to us that the doctrine therein laid down is sound, we adhere to it. That case is controlling upon the issues presented here; and so holding,-the judgment of the court below granting the injunction is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents from the ruling in the second headnote.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

1. The amendment offered by the petitioner was properly allowed, and was not open to the criticism that it was not germane . to the cause of action stated in the original petition.

2. While there is some lack of'harmony in the authorities relating to the question involved in this application for injunction, these differences of opinion among the courts existed at the time of the decision in the ease of Cosgrove v. City of Augusta, 103 Ga. 835 (31 S. E. 445, 42 L. R. A. 711, 68 Am. St. R. 149); and it appearing to us that the doctrine therein laid down is sound, we adhere to it. That case is controlling upon the issues presented here; and so holding,-the judgment of the court below granting the injunction is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents from the ruling in the second headnote.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 50, 158 Ga. 633, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-yellow-cab-co-ga-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack