City of Atlanta v. Owen

Supreme Court of Georgia

City of Atlanta v. Owen

282 S.E.2d 906, 248 Ga. 299, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 1004

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 14, 1981

Docket37360

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 282 S.E.2d 906 (City of Atlanta v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Atlanta v. Owen, 282 S.E.2d 906, 248 Ga. 299, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 1004 (Ga. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

We granted certiorari to consider whether the respondents’ action for damages based upon Code Ann. §§ 11-101 and 72-101 et seq., “arising ‘[a]s a direct and proximate result of the operation of the airport facility,’ and the routing of flights over [respondents’] property,” has been preempted by federal regulation of aircraft flights. The Court of Appeals held that there was no preemption. Owen v. City of Atlanta, 157 Ga. App. 354 (277 SE2d 338) (1981). Our review of the Court of Appeals opinion and the authorities cited therein leads this court to the same conclusion. See also Wood v. City of Huntsville, 384 S2d 1081 (Ala. 1980); Smart v. City of Los Angeles, 112 Cal. App. 3d 232 (169 Cal. Rptr. 174) (1980); 49 USCA § 1506. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

We stress that our holding is a narrow one. “All the trial judge *300 held in the instant case was that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Burbank and other federal decisions, appellants’ claims were preempted by federal regulation. All we are called upon to decide is whether that ruling was erroneous. We [hold] that it was and that appellants’ right of action is not barred by the doctrine of preemption.” Owen v. City of Atlanta, supra, at 357-358.

Decided October 14, 1981. Marva Jones Brooks, J. M. Harris, Jr., Irmina Rivero Owens for appellant. Gene Burkett, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, C. J., Hill, P. J., Marshall, Clarke, Smith and Gregory, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

We granted certiorari to consider whether the respondents’ action for damages based upon Code Ann. §§ 11-101 and 72-101 et seq., “arising ‘[a]s a direct and proximate result of the operation of the airport facility,’ and the routing of flights over [respondents’] property,” has been preempted by federal regulation of aircraft flights. The Court of Appeals held that there was no preemption. Owen v. City of Atlanta, 157 Ga. App. 354 (277 SE2d 338) (1981). Our review of the Court of Appeals opinion and the authorities cited therein leads this court to the same conclusion. See also Wood v. City of Huntsville, 384 S2d 1081 (Ala. 1980); Smart v. City of Los Angeles, 112 Cal. App. 3d 232 (169 Cal. Rptr. 174) (1980); 49 USCA § 1506. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

We stress that our holding is a narrow one. “All the trial judge *300 held in the instant case was that, under the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Burbank and other federal decisions, appellants’ claims were preempted by federal regulation. All we are called upon to decide is whether that ruling was erroneous. We [hold] that it was and that appellants’ right of action is not barred by the doctrine of preemption.” Owen v. City of Atlanta, supra, at 357-358.

Decided October 14, 1981. Marva Jones Brooks, J. M. Harris, Jr., Irmina Rivero Owens for appellant. Gene Burkett, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, C. J., Hill, P. J., Marshall, Clarke, Smith and Gregory, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 S.E.2d 906, 248 Ga. 299, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-owen-ga-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack