City of Atlanta v. McCary
This text of 266 S.E.2d 193 (City of Atlanta v. McCary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
McCary was convicted of "idling and loitering for the purposes of prostitution” contrary to the City of Atlanta Code § 17-2004. The Superior Court of Fulton County, on certiorari, reversed, holding (1) that subsections (c), (d), and (e) of Atlanta Code § 17-2004 under which McCary was convicted, were unconstitutional for lack of due process and equal protection, and (2) the evidence did not justify a rational trier of fact in finding guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). An appeal does not lie to this court at the instance of the City of Atlanta in a criminal case, where the defendant has been found not guilty. This precludes our addressing the constitutional issues. But see, Lambert v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 645 (250 SE2d 456) (1978).1
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 S.E.2d 193, 245 Ga. 582, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-mccary-ga-1980.