City of Atlanta v. Key

Court of Appeals of Georgia

City of Atlanta v. Key

155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 214, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 292

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 8, 1930

Docket20579

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 499 (City of Atlanta v. Key) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Atlanta v. Key, 155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 214, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 292 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinions

Broyles, C. J.

The maintenance of a sewerage-drainage system of a municipality in a good working and sanitary condition is á governmental function (City Council of Augusta v. Cleveland, 148 Ga. 734, 98 S. E. 345), and the city is not liable for personal injuries to one who stepped into a basin-like depression in the pavement on a street, where the depression was made and maintained by the city for the purpose of forming a catch-basin to carry surface water into one of its sewers, and where the catch-basin or depression was a part of the general engineering plan of the city’s sewerage-drainage system, and where the depression did not cause any dangerous defect or obstruction in the street or adjacent sidewalks. The allegation in the petition in the instant case, that the catch-basin made the street “unsafe and dangerous for persons using said street in the usual and ordinary modes of travel,” is merely a conclusion of the pleader and is not supported by the facts set out in the petition as amended. It follows that the petition failed to set out a cause of action, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. See, in this connection, City Council of Augusta v. Little, 115 Ga. 124 (41 S. E. 238) ; Smith v. Atlanta, 21 Ga. App. 172 (93 S. E. 1022) ; Harrison v. Atlanta, 26 Ga. App. 727 (107 S. E. 83); City Council of Augusta v. Cleveland, supra.

Judgment reversed.

Bloockvorth, J., concurs. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The maintenance of a sewerage-drainage system of a municipality in a good working and sanitary condition is á governmental function (City Council of Augusta v. Cleveland, 148 Ga. 734, 98 S. E. 345), and the city is not liable for personal injuries to one who stepped into a basin-like depression in the pavement on a street, where the depression was made and maintained by the city for the purpose of forming a catch-basin to carry surface water into one of its sewers, and where the catch-basin or depression was a part of the general engineering plan of the city’s sewerage-drainage system, and where the depression did not cause any dangerous defect or obstruction in the street or adjacent sidewalks. The allegation in the petition in the instant case, that the catch-basin made the street “unsafe and dangerous for persons using said street in the usual and ordinary modes of travel,” is merely a conclusion of the pleader and is not supported by the facts set out in the petition as amended. It follows that the petition failed to set out a cause of action, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. See, in this connection, City Council of Augusta v. Little, 115 Ga. 124 (41 S. E. 238) ; Smith v. Atlanta, 21 Ga. App. 172 (93 S. E. 1022) ; Harrison v. Atlanta, 26 Ga. App. 727 (107 S. E. 83); City Council of Augusta v. Cleveland, supra.

Judgment reversed.

Bloockvorth, J., concurs. Luke, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 214, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-key-gactapp-1930.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack