City of Atlanta v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

City of Atlanta v. Jones

82 S.E. 664, 15 Ga. App. 107, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 33

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 1, 1914

Docket5496

StatusPublished

This text of 82 S.E. 664 (City of Atlanta v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Atlanta v. Jones, 82 S.E. 664, 15 Ga. App. 107, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

Viewed in connection with the entire charge, the errors assigned upon the instructions given by the court, are without merit; and in the absence of an appropriate request for more specific instructions, the instructions actually given sufficiently presented the law applicable to the contentions of both parties. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

Viewed in connection with the entire charge, the errors assigned upon the instructions given by the court, are without merit; and in the absence of an appropriate request for more specific instructions, the instructions actually given sufficiently presented the law applicable to the contentions of both parties. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 S.E. 664, 15 Ga. App. 107, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-jones-gactapp-1914.