City of Atlanta v. Ickes

308 U.S. 517, 60 S. Ct. 170
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 1939·No. No. 32·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed on the ground that the appellant has no standing to maintain the suit. Tennessee Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 306 U. S. 118, 142; Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 302 U. S. 464,-478-479; Sprunt & Son v. United States, 281 U. S. 249, 255-256; Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227, 240-241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Atlanta v. Ickes, 308 U.S. 517, 60 S. Ct. 170 (1939).

308 U.S. 517 (City of Atlanta v. Ickes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committee
614 P.2d 276 (California Supreme Court, 1980)
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farr
243 F. Supp. 957 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Bryan v. Federal Open Market Committee
235 F. Supp. 877 (D. Montana, 1964)
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
341 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Gudgel v. Iverson
87 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Kentucky, 1949)
Koster v. Turchi
79 F. Supp. 268 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1948)
United States v. Public Utilities Commission
151 F.2d 609 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)
Stark v. Wickard
321 U.S. 288 (Supreme Court, 1944)
Frahn v. Tennessee Valley Authority
41 F. Supp. 83 (N.D. Alabama, 1941)
Woodruff v. United States
40 F. Supp. 949 (D. Connecticut, 1941)
Hammond-Knowlton v. United States
121 F.2d 192 (Second Circuit, 1941)