City of Atlanta v. Atlanta Journal Co.

198 S.E. 788, 186 Ga. 734, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 683
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1938
DocketNo. 12330
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 198 S.E. 788 (City of Atlanta v. Atlanta Journal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Atlanta v. Atlanta Journal Co., 198 S.E. 788, 186 Ga. 734, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 683 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

The Atlanta Journal Company, duly licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to use and operate a radio station designated by the call letters WSB, instituted an action against the City of Atlanta, seeking to enjoin the city from issuing or seeking to issue and enforce any execution, one of which had actually issued and been levied upon the property of the plaintiff, for the collection of “the business license tax” pursuant to the following city ordinance: “Any person, firm, or corporation hereinafter referred to as a ‘local broadcaster’ who operates a place of business within the City of Atlanta, wherein such ‘local broadcaster’ maintains radio-broadcasting apparatus and facilities for sending messages over the ether waves, whereby for a consideration paid to the ‘local broadcaster’ time is sold, [735]*735leased, or contracted for, or the apparatus and facilities of the ‘local broadcaster5 are used by persons, firms, or corporations hereinafter referred to as ‘local advertisers,5 for the advertising of products, goods, wares, or merchandise, or for service of ‘local advertisers5 doing business in the City of Atlanta, to the general public residents of the City of Atlanta and the State of Georgia, shall be subject to an annual business license tax, for carrying on the business of broadcasting local advertisement to prospective customer resident in Atlanta or Georgia, the sum of $300, payable in quarterly installments beginning at the third quarter of 1937. Provided, however, the foregoing shall not be construed as to include the imposition of a business license on any radio-broadcasting station that leases or sells its entire time or uses its apparatus or facilities altogether for the broadcasting of programs or advertising matter brought to Atlanta by wire or wireless and rebroadcasting from Atlanta, or broadcasting advertisement intended entirely for the benefit of persons non-residents of Atlanta and State of Georgia.55 This ordinance was adopted on July 6, 1937, approved on the following day, and repealed the then existing license tax on “radio-broadcasting station $300.55 It is alleged in the petition that the plaintiff is engaged in interstate commerce; that the broadcasting of messages is not divisible into intrastate and interstate communications; and that if the ordinance in question be held to apply to the plaintiff, it imposes a burden upon interstate commerce, contrary to art. 1, see. 8, par. 3, of the constitution of the United States. The following appeared from the agreed statement of facts on which the case was submitted to the court without a jury:

“The offices and broadcasting rooms of said station [WSB] are located in the Atlanta Biltmore Hotel in the City of Atlanta, wherein the business of the radio station is transacted; contracts for sale or lease of time of the station are entered into; also there is located in these offices rooms in which programs are received which come to Atlanta by telephone over network programs, as well as rooms for programs which originate in Atlanta; also the radio equipment such as transmitters, microphones, etc., necessary to relay or transmit programs over the ether waves. . . The radio station is operated continually every day from 5:45 a. m. to 12 o’clock midnight. . . The average number [736]*736of hours the station broadcasts programs originating outside of Georgia and brought to Atlanta by wire and then rebroadcast, and for which the station is paid for time sold, is approximately four hours and twenty-nine minutes per day; the average number of hours which the station devotes to broadcasting or rebroadcasting programs of a public nature, such as governmental or educational, is about seven hours per day; the average number of hours devoted by the station to broadcasting programs or “spot” advertisements, which originate in its Atlanta studio and for which it receives compensation, is approximately two hours per day. The greater part of these two-hour periods refers to programs recorded out of Georgia on records and sent to Atlanta for broadcasting. In that sense only do they originate in the Atlanta studio. . . The station sells time to persons, firms, and corporations carrying on business in Atlanta. The station for ■ a staled and agreed charge sells time over its station for periods varying from one minute to thirty minutes or longer; the amount of the charge being dependent upon the length and time of dang the station is used. . . One type of advertising that is used by the local merchants is known as ‘spot announcements/ which means that the radio announcer in the interval between regular programs, makes a short announcement which advertises some, person’s business or product sold by him. . . During the year 1937 merchants and dealers having their place of business in Atlanta have, for compensation paid to the station, broadcasted advertisements over station WSB in the sale of clothing, coal, automobiles, automobile accessories, household goods, soft drinks, beer, jewelry, gasoline, -and oils. That said merchants and dealers were those who sold at retail, or wholesale, either • or both. That during political campaigns the facilities of said radio station are leased to candidates for political offices, and speeches are made in behalf of their campaign. In 1936 candidates for state, county and city offices used said station for such purposes, and in 1937 candidates at a special election for county commissioner in Fulton County used said station for such purposes, for which the station received revenues.
“That the Atlanta Journal uses said station six times daily for ñfteen-minute intervals to broadcast news items and features appearing in the Atlanta Journal. The Atlanta Journal circulates [737]*737and is subscribed for in each State surrounding Georgia and in many other States and foreign nations, and these programs are intended to reach, and do reach, not only the people of Georgia, but the people of other states of the United States and people of foreign nations. That the station is part of the network of the National Broadcasting Company, by virtue of a contract between the National Broadcasting Company and the Atlanta Journal, by which the Atlanta Journal broadcasts certain programs of the National Broadcasting Company. . . That the plaintiff’s business furnishes a valuable advertising medium to many forms of industry and business upon an international, national, and regional scale, and has served the listening public in said territories with many educational and entertaining features. That the plaintiff’s station is one of the most powerful in the southeastern states, and is one of the largest stations of the country, and is known as a 50,000-watt station, and operates on a frequency of 740 kilocycles. That all messages which emanate from said station pass the boundary lines of Georgia and into the surrounding states and the territory beyond, and this applies to all messages whether from local advertisers or from any one else. Every message which is sent out is received in states other than Georgia, and listeners in other states other than Georgia comprise a large portion of the plaintiff’s audience, whether the programs originate in Atlanta or Eulton County ox Georgia or elsewhere.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorsky v. Brown
51 So. 2d 360 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Beard, Collector v. Vinsonhaler
221 S.W.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1949)
Albuquerque Broadcasting Co. v. Bureau of Revenue
184 P.2d 416 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.E. 788, 186 Ga. 734, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-atlanta-v-atlanta-journal-co-ga-1938.