City of Asbury Park, N. J. v. Christmas

78 F.2d 1003, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 22, 1935·No. 5823·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

Assuming for present purposes the power of the court below in ordinary cases to issue a writ, of mandamus upon a municipality to aid a judgment creditor in enforcing such judgment, it still remains the law, as stated by the Supreme Court of the United States in Duncan Townsite Co. v. Lane, 245 U. S. 308, 311, 38 S. Ct. 99, 101, 62 L. Ed. 309, that: “Mandamus is an extraordinary remedial process which .is awarded, not as a matter of right, but in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion. It issues' to remedy a wrong, not to promote one; to compel the performance of a duty which ought to be performed, not to direct an act which will work a public or private mischief or will be within the strict letter of the law but in disregard of its spirit.”

After due consideration, we are of opinion that sound judicial discretion does not warrant the exercise of such power ■at this time. In view of the efforts that are being made — we assume in good faith —by this municipality tp provide to the limit of its power for the equality of treatment to all bondholders, we vacate the mandamus order granted, but direct the court to retain jurisdiction of the petition for the present.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Asbury Park, N. J. v. Christmas, 78 F.2d 1003, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920 (3d Cir. 1935).

78 F.2d 1003 (City of Asbury Park, N. J. v. Christmas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist.
169 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1948)
Christmas v. City of Asbury Park
53 F. Supp. 64 (D. New Jersey, 1943)
Murdoch v. City of Asbury Park
48 F. Supp. 18 (S.D. New York, 1942)
King v. United States ex rel. Tiedtke
100 F.2d 797 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)
In Re CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA
23 F. Supp. 229 (S.D. Florida, 1938)