City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi

Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)

City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

DecidedJanuary 8, 2026

Docket02-25-00406-CV

StatusPublished

This text of City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi (City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-25-00406-CV

CITY OF ARLINGTON, Appellant § On Appeal from the 342nd District Court

V. § of Tarrant County (342-350490-24)

§ January 8, 2026

CERKEZI ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., D/B/A § Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack EURO CAR TECH, AND ELIO CERKEZI, Appellees

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s combined traditional and no-

evidence motion for summary judgment and plea to the jurisdiction (the Motion). It

is ordered that the trial court’s order denying the Motion is reversed, and we render

judgment dismissing Appellees’ claims against Appellant.

It is further ordered that Appellees shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which

let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI