City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi
Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
No. 02-25-00406-CV
CITY OF ARLINGTON, Appellant § On Appeal from the 342nd District Court V. § of Tarrant County (342-350490-24)
§ January 8, 2026
CERKEZI ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., D/B/A § Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack EURO CAR TECH, AND ELIO CERKEZI, Appellees
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s combined traditional and no- evidence motion for summary judgment and plea to the jurisdiction (the Motion). It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying the Motion is reversed, and we render judgment dismissing Appellees’ claims against Appellant.
It is further ordered that Appellees shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi (City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.