City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)·Decided January 8, 2026·No. 02-25-00406-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-25-00406-CV

CITY OF ARLINGTON, Appellant § On Appeal from the 342nd District Court V. § of Tarrant County (342-350490-24)

§ January 8, 2026

CERKEZI ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., D/B/A § Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack EURO CAR TECH, AND ELIO CERKEZI, Appellees

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s combined traditional and no- evidence motion for summary judgment and plea to the jurisdiction (the Motion). It is ordered that the trial court’s order denying the Motion is reversed, and we render judgment dismissing Appellees’ claims against Appellant.

It is further ordered that Appellees shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi (City of Arlington v. Cerkezi Enterprises, L.L. C., D/B/A Euro Car Tech, and Elio Cerkezi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.