City of Ardmore v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

City of Ardmore v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

1936 OK 435, 58 P.2d 584, 177 Okla. 210, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 629

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 9, 1936·No. No. 26177.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This proceeding was begun October 4, 1933, to secure the exemption from taxes of certain gasoline purchased by the city of Ardmore.

On the 10th day of April, 1934, this com’t rendered its opinion in City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. Tax Commission, 168 Okla. 316, *211 32 P. (2d) 728, which, it is agreed 'by all of the parties hereto, disposes of the issues involved in this ease.

■ The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

OSBORN, Y. O. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. MeNEILL, C. J.,‘ and BAYLESS and PHELPS, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This proceeding was begun October 4, 1933, to secure the exemption from taxes of certain gasoline purchased by the city of Ardmore.

On the 10th day of April, 1934, this com’t rendered its opinion in City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. Tax Commission, 168 Okla. 316, *211 32 P. (2d) 728, which, it is agreed 'by all of the parties hereto, disposes of the issues involved in this ease.

■ The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

OSBORN, Y. O. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, WELCH, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. MeNEILL, C. J.,‘ and BAYLESS and PHELPS, JJ., absent.

City of Ardmore v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 1936 OK 435, 58 P.2d 584, 177 Okla. 210, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 629 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK 435 (City of Ardmore v. Oklahoma Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related