City of Amsterdam v. W. N. Carpenter Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of Amsterdam v. W. N. Carpenter Co.

170 A.D. 938, 154 N.Y.S. 1092, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9117

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Practically the same question "which is presented by this appeal has been considered and decided by us in Danes v. State of New York (169 App. Div. 443), and the opinion in that case is being handed down at this time. Therefore, in this matter, the order, so far as appealed from, is reversed on the opinion in Danes v. State of New York (supra). And the award of $500 made by the Commission to the landowner for his rights in the bed of the Mohawk river is reinstated. All concurred, except Smith, P. J., and Lyon, J., dissenting. Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Practically the same question "which is presented by this appeal has been considered and decided by us in Danes v. State of New York (169 App. Div. 443), and the opinion in that case is being handed down at this time. Therefore, in this matter, the order, so far as appealed from, is reversed on the opinion in Danes v. State of New York (supra). And the award of $500 made by the Commission to the landowner for his rights in the bed of the Mohawk river is reinstated. All concurred, except Smith, P. J., and Lyon, J., dissenting. Order affirmed, with costs.

City of Amsterdam v. W. N. Carpenter Co., 170 A.D. 938, 154 N.Y.S. 1092, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

170 A.D. 938 (City of Amsterdam v. W. N. Carpenter Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related