City of Amsterdam v. Board of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of Amsterdam v. Board of Assessors

111 A.D.2d 1017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 111 A.D.2d 1017 (City of Amsterdam v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Amsterdam v. Board of Assessors, 111 A.D.2d 1017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Dier, J.), entered September 19, 1984 in Saratoga County, which, in proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, granted petitioner’s motion to file a supplemental appraisal report.

By motion dated August 17, 1984, petitioner sought permission pursuant to 22 NYCRR 839.2 to file and serve a supplement to its appraisal report. Specifically, this supplemental report prepared by an engineer detailed the question of depreciation of certain improvements on petitioner’s real property. Special Term granted this motion and the instant appeal ensued.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether Special Term abused its discretion in granting the motion. After conducting a review of the record, we conclude that Special Term abused its discretion. We do not find that the requisite “good cause” has been established to permit an exception to the strict standards imposed by prior decisions of this court (see, Salesian Socy. v Village of Ellenville, 98 AD2d 927, 928).

Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and motion denied. Kane, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr. and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI