City of Alpena ex rel. Beaudrie v. Murray Co.

159 Mich. 336
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1909·No. Docket No. 10·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Brooke, J.

This is a companion case to that of the City of Alpena, for use of O’Brien, v. Surety Co., ante, 334 (123 N. W. 1126), and is controlled thereby, except as to the claim of Eugene H. Furbush, which was for cartage of lumber, coal, machinery, and other supplies to and from the dredge used by the Murray Company in the prosecution of its work under the contract. This use plaintiff is not entitled to the protection of the bond under our determination in the case of the City of Alpena, for [337] use of Besser, v. Surety Co., ante, 329 (123 N. W. 1126). See cases there cited.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered as to all use plaintiffs except Furbush.

Blair, C. J., and Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Alpena ex rel. Beaudrie v. Murray Co., 159 Mich. 336 (Mich. 1909).

159 Mich. 336 (City of Alpena ex rel. Beaudrie v. Murray Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Kent Refining Co.
20 F. Supp. 662 (W.D. Michigan, 1937)
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Day & Maddock Co.
150 N.E. 426 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson County
253 S.W. 835 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.
127 P. 573 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
City of Alpena ex rel. Gilchrist v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
168 Mich. 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)