City of Albany v. Yaras
This text of 158 N.E.2d 855 (City of Albany v. Yaras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, in the following Per Curiam: We hold that the order was appealable to the Appellate Division. Upon this record, the County Judge and the Commissioners of Appraisal may not be removed. (Judiciary Law, § 14; Matter of Hancock, 91 N. Y. 284, 292-293; Matter of Dodge & Stevenson Mfg. Co., 77 N. Y. 101; Matter of Rotwein [Goodman], 291 N. Y. 116, 123; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 229 N. Y. 460, 467.) The three questions certified [(a), (b) and (c)] are answered as follows: (a) in the affirmative; (b) in the negative; (c) not answered. Motion to strike material from respondent’s brief granted to the extent of striking therefrom the material contained at pages 61 to 70; motion otherwise denied.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 N.E.2d 855, 6 N.Y.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-albany-v-yaras-ny-1959.