City National Bank v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

City National Bank v. Bridges

128 S.E. 694, 34 Ga. App. 178, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 122

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 22, 1925

Docket16444

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 694 (City National Bank v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City National Bank v. Bridges, 128 S.E. 694, 34 Ga. App. 178, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 122 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Bkoyx.es, C. J.

1. Where the judge has finally passed on the merits of a motion for a new trial, the question as to the sufficiency of the approval of the grounds of the motion will not be entertained by the reviewing court, unless it was first raised and insisted upon before the trial judge. Ga. L. 1911, § 3, p. .150.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court which are complained of, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole and the facts of the case, disclose no material error.

3. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI