City National Bank of Dothan v. Brice

Supreme Court of Alabama

City National Bank of Dothan v. Brice

350 So. 2d 333, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 2197

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 3, 1977

DocketSC 2195

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 333 (City National Bank of Dothan v. Brice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City National Bank of Dothan v. Brice, 350 So. 2d 333, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 2197 (Ala. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

ALMON, Justice.

We granted certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals to determine whether alimony could be garnished. We concluded in Andrews v. City National Bank of Birmingham, Ala., 349 So.2d 1 (1977), decided today, that alimony may be garnished. The facts in this case are substantially the same as those in Andrews except that the debt here was contracted prior to the divorce. This factual distinction is without significance.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed on the authority of Andrews, supra, and the cause is remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TOLBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur. MADDOX and JONES, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI