City Nat. Bk., Hackensack v. Di Napoli
146 A. 913, 104 N.J. Eq. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 544
This text of 146 A. 913 (City Nat. Bk., Hackensack v. Di Napoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City Nat. Bk., Hackensack v. Di Napoli, 146 A. 913, 104 N.J. Eq. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 544 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 392.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 913, 104 N.J. Eq. 494, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-nat-bk-hackensack-v-di-napoli-nj-1929.