City MacHine & Tool Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

194 F.2d 535, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 843, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4242, 41 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 843
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 22, 1952·No. 11439·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs.

And the court being fully advised;

And it appearing that the United States Tax Court in this case held in effect that in a proceeding brought before it under Section 732(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 732(a), from the disallowance of a claim for relief under Section 722, 26 U.S.C.A. § 722, no issue could be raised other than the right to relief under Section 722;

And it appearing that the Commissioner confesses error and concedes that the order of the Tax Court entered February 19, 1951, should be reversed;

And it appearing that Section 732, 26 U.S.C.A. (a) provides that a taxpayer may file a petition for redetermination of the excess profits tax and that the tax cannot correctly be redetermined unless all pertinent factors entering into its determination are considered. H. Fendrich, Inc., v. Com *536 missioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 916.

It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be and it hereby is reversed and the case is remanded to the Tax Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City MacHine & Tool Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 194 F.2d 535, 41 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 843, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4242, 41 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 843 (6th Cir. 1952).

194 F.2d 535 (City MacHine & Tool Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related