City, Hartford v. Int. Assn., Firefighters, No. Cv 98 0583047 (Nov. 1, 1999)
This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14564 (City, Hartford v. Int. Assn., Firefighters, No. Cv 98 0583047 (Nov. 1, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The arbitration award conforms to the unrestricted submission;
2. The court cannot and should not substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrators, who unanimously concluded that the City had not met its burden of proof with regard to the suspension and lacked just cause for the indefinite suspension.Diamond Fertilizer and Chemical Corp. v. Commodities TrainingInt'l. Corp.,
3. In light of the facts in the record, the panel's award did not contravene an explicit, well-defined and dominant public policy. Watertown Police Union Local 541 v. Watertown,
CT Page 14565
Douglas S. Lavine Judge, Superior Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-hartford-v-int-assn-firefighters-no-cv-98-0583047-nov-1-connsuperct-1999.