City Engineering Construction Co. v. Loeffler

Appellate Court of Illinois

City Engineering Construction Co. v. Loeffler

204 Ill. App. 430, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 433

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 26, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,750

StatusPublished

This text of 204 Ill. App. 430 (City Engineering Construction Co. v. Loeffler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City Engineering Construction Co. v. Loeffler, 204 Ill. App. 430, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 433 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Building and construction contracts, § 85*—what is bar to recovery by contractor. Where the plaintiff by contract agreed to erect for the defendants certain buildings and to procure building loans therefor, held that his failure to procure such loans would be a bar to his recovery for a breach of the contract by the defendants. 2. Building and construction contracts, § 103*—when evidence is sufficient to show failure of contractor to procure loans. In an action by a contractor to recover for alleged breach of a building contract, evidence held sufficient to sustain the finding that plaintiff had failed to prove its readiness and ability to procure certain loans which it had contracted with defendants to procure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Building and construction contracts, § 85*—what is bar to recovery by contractor. Where the plaintiff by contract agreed to erect for the defendants certain buildings and to procure building loans therefor, held that his failure to procure such loans would be a bar to his recovery for a breach of the contract by the defendants. 2. Building and construction contracts, § 103*—when evidence is sufficient to show failure of contractor to procure loans. In an action by a contractor to recover for alleged breach of a building contract, evidence held sufficient to sustain the finding that plaintiff had failed to prove its readiness and ability to procure certain loans which it had contracted with defendants to procure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Ill. App. 430, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-engineering-construction-co-v-loeffler-illappct-1917.