City Electric Railway Co. v. Officers of Court
38 S.E. 829, 113 Ga. 341, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 248
Opinion
When a judge is calling a docket for the exclusive purpose of assigning the cases thereon for trial at a future time, and an attorney for the plaintiff in a given case, when the same is reached, announces merely as a reason for not setting the same for trial that said case will be dismissed, but does not move to then and there dismiss it, the judge can not properly force the parties to make an immediate and final disposition of the case, either by dismissal or otherwise. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City Electric Railway Co. v. Officers of Court, 38 S.E. 829, 113 Ga. 341, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 248 (Ga. 1901).
38 S.E. 829 (City Electric Railway Co. v. Officers of Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. State
336 S.E.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)