City Council v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc.
This text of 189 Ga. 618 (City Council v. Southern Grocery Stores Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is controlled in all material respects by Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Columbus, 189 Ga. 458 (6 S. E. 2d, 320), in which all the essential facts were similar, and which we consider sound. On the question of the duty of courts to declare a municipal ordinance invalid as unreasonable, the Columbus ease is supported in terms by Richardson v. Coker, 188 Ga. 170 (3 S. E. 2d, 636), and in our opinion is also supported by other earlier unanimous decisions of this court. The motion to review and overrule the two cases named is, after full consideration, denied. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed for the reasons stated in the Oolumbus case; that is, the court had equitable jurisdiction, and the ordinance levying the tax was unreasonable. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 Ga. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-council-v-southern-grocery-stores-inc-ga-1940.