City Council v. Payne

2 Nott & McC. 475, 11 S.C.L. 475
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1820·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Oourt was delivered by

Gantt, J.

After the very able view which has been taken by the Recorder, of the nature of the offence of which the party rescued had been guilty, and of the propriety and legality of the power given to the City Council, to cause such offenders against the safety and peace of the city to be arrested, it would be superfluous to add anything in support of the opinions advanced in his report. As to the law of the case, the deductions drawn by him from the facts which the case presents, are considered as correct; and his opinion is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

Richardson, Huger, Bay, Nott and Johnson, JJ., concurred.

See Acts, 1839, 11 Stat. 56, § 10; 1855, 12 Stat. 421.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City Council v. Payne, 2 Nott & McC. 475, 11 S.C.L. 475 (S.C. 1820).

2 Nott & McC. 475 (City Council v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Town of Mount Pleasant
566 S.E.2d 523 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
State v. Rivers
196 S.E. 6 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
State v. Quinn
97 S.E. 62 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1918)
Loggins v. Southern Ry.
42 S.E. 163 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1902)
People v. Johnson
13 L.R.A. 163 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
Mitchell v. Lemon
34 Md. 176 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1871)