City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Fifth Circuit

City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

246 F. 440, 158 C.C.A. 504, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1371

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 29, 1917

DocketNo. 3134

StatusPublished

This text of 246 F. 440 (City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 246 F. 440, 158 C.C.A. 504, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1371 (5th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree ordering the issuance of a preliminary injunction. Our examination of the record has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that there was an abuse of discretion, in making the order complained of, and that it has not been made to appear that the order has resulted, or is likely to result, in causing any substantial injury to the appellant while the cause is pending, even though the appellee should fail, in the trial of the case on its merits, to' sustain the right asserted by its bill.

As no prejudicial error is shown, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree ordering the issuance of a preliminary injunction. Our examination of the record has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that there was an abuse of discretion, in making the order complained of, and that it has not been made to appear that the order has resulted, or is likely to result, in causing any substantial injury to the appellant while the cause is pending, even though the appellee should fail, in the trial of the case on its merits, to' sustain the right asserted by its bill.

As no prejudicial error is shown, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 F. 440, 158 C.C.A. 504, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-council-of-augusta-v-postal-telegraph-cable-co-ca5-1917.