City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Fifth Circuit

City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

246 F. 440, 158 C.C.A. 504, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1371

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 29, 1917·No. No. 3134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree ordering the issuance of a preliminary injunction. Our examination of the record has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that there was an abuse of discretion, in making the order complained of, and that it has not been made to appear that the order has resulted, or is likely to result, in causing any substantial injury to the appellant while the cause is pending, even though the appellee should fail, in the trial of the case on its merits, to' sustain the right asserted by its bill.

As no prejudicial error is shown, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree ordering the issuance of a preliminary injunction. Our examination of the record has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that there was an abuse of discretion, in making the order complained of, and that it has not been made to appear that the order has resulted, or is likely to result, in causing any substantial injury to the appellant while the cause is pending, even though the appellee should fail, in the trial of the case on its merits, to' sustain the right asserted by its bill.

As no prejudicial error is shown, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 246 F. 440, 158 C.C.A. 504, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1371 (5th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

246 F. 440 (City Council of Augusta v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.