City Centre One Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n

D. Utah

City Centre One Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n

655 F. Supp. 1431, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16869

CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah

DecidedMarch 23, 1987

DocketCiv. No. 86-C-0332A

StatusPublished

This text of 655 F. Supp. 1431 (City Centre One Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City Centre One Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n, 655 F. Supp. 1431, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16869 (D. Utah 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.

Defendant has moved this court for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 on the issue of its right to retain fees and deposits paid to it by plaintiff under the loan commitment agreement of March 27, 1984. Defendant claims that it is entitled to retain fees of $30,000 paid to cover appraisal, engineering and legal fees, and deposits in cash and letters of credit amounting to $290,000. The loan commitment agreement provided that the fees were to be non-refundable in all events and that the deposits were to be non-refundable if plaintiff failed to comply with any of its covenants under the agreement.

The court finds, however, that important questions of fact remain to be established regarding both the circumstances of the parties’ failure to close the loan and also how much of the $30,000 in fees was actually expended by defendant for the stated purposes. Since a motion for summary judgment is to be granted only if there appears to be no genuine issue as to any material fact, the motion for partial summary judgment should be denied.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.

Defendant has moved this court for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 on the issue of its right to retain fees and deposits paid to it by plaintiff under the loan commitment agreement of March 27, 1984. Defendant claims that it is entitled to retain fees of $30,000 paid to cover appraisal, engineering and legal fees, and deposits in cash and letters of credit amounting to $290,000. The loan commitment agreement provided that the fees were to be non-refundable in all events and that the deposits were to be non-refundable if plaintiff failed to comply with any of its covenants under the agreement.

The court finds, however, that important questions of fact remain to be established regarding both the circumstances of the parties’ failure to close the loan and also how much of the $30,000 in fees was actually expended by defendant for the stated purposes. Since a motion for summary judgment is to be granted only if there appears to be no genuine issue as to any material fact, the motion for partial summary judgment should be denied.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 F. Supp. 1431, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-centre-one-associates-v-teachers-insurance-annuity-assn-utd-1987.