City Bank v. Mayor of Macon

1 Ga. L. Rep. 159
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 159 (City Bank v. Mayor of Macon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City Bank v. Mayor of Macon, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 159 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

1. Where several pleas were filed to an action, and [160]*160.a verdict was rendered for the defendant “on all the pleas,” this was sufficient without finding as to each separately; and if there be sufficient evidence to sustain the finding as to one of the pleas, the verdict will not be set aside. Code, §§8560, 3561.

Lyon & Gresham, for plaintiff in error. Hill & Harris; W. A. Hawkins, for defendants.

2. While the evidence is conflicting, yet there was enough to warrant a verdict finding that the first note, in place of which that in suit was given, and on which the maker of the second note was endorser, had been settled, and therefore that there was no consideration to support the second note.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-bank-v-mayor-of-macon-ga-1885.